StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Foundation of Criminal Law - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
Foundation of Criminal Law
The prosecution must be able to prove mens rea; that is, the accused had an appropriate knowledge, criminal intelligence, intention, or recklessness at the relevant time. Recklessness is one of the four likely mental state classes that constitute mens rea…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.6% of users find it useful
Foundation of Criminal Law
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Foundation of Criminal Law"

?FOUNDATION OF CRIMINAL LAW of Foundation of Criminal Law Under the criminal law,a crime constitutes of both the physical and mental element (mens rea). Mens rea is an element of criminal responsibility which states that there is a mental element in a criminal conduct; guilty mind; criminal intent; a wrongful or guilty purpose or wilfulness. The prosecution must be able to prove mens rea; that is, the accused had an appropriate knowledge, criminal intelligence, intention, or recklessness at the relevant time.1 Recklessness is one of the four likely mental state classes that constitute mens rea. Recklessness may constitute offenses that involve considerable danger to another person or against property.2 N.P. Metcalfe and A.J. Ashworth, in their case commentary, Arson: mens rea - recklessness whether property destroyed or damaged’ (2004) Crim L R 369, analyse and critically evaluate the decisions of the House of Lords in R v G [2003] UKHL 50; [2004] 1 A.C. 1034 and R. v Caldwell (James) [1982] A.C. 341. This paper will briefly identify the key arguments that were advanced in the commentary and discuss whether Metcalfe and Ashworth’s critical evaluation of the tow decisions is persuasively argued. In the case of R v Caldwell, Metcalfe and Ashworth comment that throughout the judgement of R v Caldwell, Lord Diplock appeared to only address his mind to the class of defendant who would normally have the capacity of foreseeing the risk. They thus argue that this narrow focus in the case is what subsequently led to the arising of the problems in this case. They further comment that the House of Lords did not consider particular classes of defendant who would not be able to foresee any risk, even though they could have been asked to think about foreseeing.3 Metcalfe and Ashworth also made a commentary in the decision of the House of Lords relating to mens rea and which was quite related to the case of R v Caldwell; this was the case of R v G. In this case, the issue was whether the children of eight or more years are able to have an understanding of the difference between right and wrong, and if the test of “obviousness” might operate fairly for the defendants who were of 11 and 12 years age if they were held to similar standard as reasonable adults.4 The House of Lords in this respect stated that a person can be considered to act “recklessly” if: he is in a circumstance that he is aware that a risk will or exists; in a result when he is aware that a risk will happen; and if it occurs to him that it is unreasonable to take risk, in circumstances that are known to him.5 Moreover, in their commentary, Metcalfe and Ashworth noted how the House of Lords in R v G departed from the House of Lords’ decision in R v Caldwell. Metcalfe and Ashworth argue that Lord Diplock’s ruling in R v Caldwell could not be supported by statutory interpretations, as both Lord Bingham and Lord Steyn clearly spelt out in R v G. Besides, they comment that the considerations in R v Caldwell not only misinterpreted the statute, but also went against the principle that require subjective mens rea for serious crime conviction, and which led to unfair results that may not be either just or moral. They also point out how application of the decision in R v Caldwell would amount to injustice as it violates the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.6 Metcalfe and Ashworth acknowledge in their commentary that the meaning of “recklessness” cannot only be applied in the Criminal Damage Act as had seemed to be implied in R v Caldwell. They note that Lord Bingham in the case of R v G though that Lord Diplock and other majority members in R v Caldwell were so set in the course to an extent that they could not have reached a different outcome regarding the case involving the capacity of children and young persons. Metcalfe and Ashworth argue that their was stubbornness in the interpretation of “reckless” in R v Caldwell and other similar cases in 1980s, a situation that was a great source of potential injustice. They observe that both R v Caldwell and R v G brought up the question of legal policy.7 According to them, the claim that it is unfair to apply objective standard to standard citizens was quite invalid because there are very few cases where the court might be unable to find that the defendant had some fleeting awareness regarding a particular circumstance. They fault Lord Diplock when he sought to argue the social and moral case for expanding “recklessness” definition in R v Caldwell.8 According to them, this was done in undifferentiated manner and in a way that gave no thought to the children liability or other circumstances that are awkward. They argue that House of Lords decision in R v G, though suggested general trend towards subjective principles of liability, the position was not clear yet. They are of the view that the courts are continuing to uphold strict liability for offences that might carry prison sentences of relatively smaller length. Metcalfe and Ashworth’s critical evaluation of the two decisions are persuasively argued. They have remarkably commented on the aspect of mens rea, and particularly recklessness. They have used two cases that are related to each other, and which the House of Lords made decisions that were seemingly contradicting. The two cases are majorly on the “subjective or objective” characterisation; that is, whether criminal liability should have subjective or objective elements.9 They have pointed out how Lord Diplock and other majority made decisions that could not be supported by statutory interpretation, and went against the principle that require subjective mens rea for serious crime conviction. They persuasively argue how R v G departed from the decision in R v Caldwell and also how “recklessness” was defined in both cases. They also persuasively brought to the fore how the issues of “recklessness” raises the legal policy question. They finally conclude by stating that the social and moral arguments relating to mens rea and recklessness in particular are not all stacked on one side.10 Bibliography BOOKS Burchell J and J Milton, Principles of Criminal Law, (Lansdowne 2005) Smith O, Criminal Law, (Sweet & Maxwell 2012) JOURNAL ARTICLE Stewart F & L Mervyn, “The Capacity for Recklessness” (1992) 12 Legal Studies 74. CASE LAWS R v G [2003] UKHL 50; [2004] 1 A.C. 1034 R. v Caldwell (James) [1982] A.C. 341. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Foundation of Criminal Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Foundation of Criminal Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1445721-foundation-of-criminal-law
(Foundation of Criminal Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Foundation of Criminal Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1445721-foundation-of-criminal-law.
“Foundation of Criminal Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1445721-foundation-of-criminal-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Foundation of Criminal Law

Criminal Law Foundation

Name: University: Abstract: The 4th Amendment of the US constitution protects every individual from unreasonable search and seizure while the 5th Amendment provides that the due process of law must be fair.... The Exclusionary Rule provides that any evidence obtained by the law enforcement authorities is inadmissible before the court proceedings since it violates the 4th Amendment safeguarded rights (Hall, 2012).... However, some state courts, the US Supreme court have adopted a selective basis to determine the due process of the criminal defendant while safeguarding the protected rights....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Foundations of Criminal Law-resit journal article analysis

Foundations of criminal law: Case Commentary Analysis Name: Instructor: Course: Date: Foundations of criminal law: Case Commentary Analysis Mens Rea is a Latin word for a (guilty mind).... 1Cath Crosby, “Recklessness – the Continuing Search for a Definition” The Journal of criminal law (2008) 313 -334 Accordingly in the instant case, the judge's directions, which were based on a previous decision of the House of Lords, now departed from, were incorrect, and the conviction of the defendants would be quashed....
4 Pages (1000 words) Coursework

Criminal Law Foundations

This substantially includes children or minor individuals who are covered by the existing juvenile law under the juvenile court.... Employing the same to minor could be considered as child abuse if the law relevant to it would be placed open for interpretation.... Under the criminal justice system, this simply is a call not to violate the human rights especially by compelling a man or a child to tell something that may stand against one's will or welfare, without substantial touch of truth and appropriate legal process....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Criminal Law Foundations Evaluation

criminal law Foundations Course/Number Date Assessing the impact of globalisation on the U.... Similarly, the financial implications of globalisation on the US criminal justice system is underscored by the fact that since globalisation has made terrorism a global problem and America's interests are spread both locally and globally, the US has had to increase and fine-tune the operations of its law enforcement agencies to incorporate US' international interests....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Criminal Law: the Trial of John W. Hinckley

In the paper “criminal law: the Trial of John W.... However, Australian law takes a similar approach to English law with respect to the men's rea requirement for complicity.... G contends that the judge disastrous to leave manslaughter to the jury as a possible verdict in relation to each of the 2 men who were killed, and that this constituted a wrong decision on a question of law.... The culpability of the second participant in the event that the primary participant shot and killed or with intent to cause grievous bodily harm the victim would depend upon the scope of their common design that means joint criminal venture....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

The Philosophical Foundations of the American Criminal Justice System

One reason that prompted a change in the constitution was that the British law did not offer equal justice and was favoring the English.... The American law enforcement is no exception of what America inherited from the Great Britain.... This paper “The Philosophical Foundations of the American criminal Justice System” explores in details the history, structure, process, strengths, weaknesses, aims, and the philosophical foundation upon which The American criminal Justice System is founded....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper

Personal Development Plan Analysis

Modules studied include: Contract Law, Equity and the Law of Trust, European Union Law, Foundation of Criminal Law, Legal Method and Skills, Law of Tort, Constitutional and Administrative Law, Law of S accession, Law of Business Association, Land Law, Civil Litigation, Criminal… Foundation of LLB (Hons) Law program which include; Legal Skills, Law of Contract, Criminal Law, English Legal System, Public Law, Interactive Learning Skills and Communication 2, Mass Communication, Composition and Style, Principle of ked at (Huta Hegerfeld Environmental Works ltd) in the administration and human resources office as an administrator responsible for the company relationship and employment registration including visa requirements for non- Saudi employments....
7 Pages (1750 words) Coursework

Historical And Constitutional Foundation Of Civil And Criminal Law

The paper "Historical And Constitutional Foundation Of Civil And criminal law" discusses the history of the world's legal systems.... Modern law and modern legal system are distinguishable from the earlier primitive legal systems by the presence of certain structural elements.... The English common law from the 12th to 15th centuries also made advances in the legal system with better differentiation of felonies from minor offenses and later with misdemeanors....
6 Pages (1500 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us